logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.23 2016나60532
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence

[A] According to the overall purport of each statement and argument of evidence Nos. 2 and 7, since C, a member of the household of the defendant, obtained a donation of houses Nos. 4 and 5 Dong 102 on September 10, 207, Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and owned houses No. 4 and 102 on September 10, 207, it is recognized that the defendant entered into a contract for renewal of the lease with the plaintiff on May 4, 2015, even though the requirements for a homeless household have ceased to exist. Therefore, the defendant is recognized to have the grounds for termination of the contract corresponding to the "where a rental house is leased by fraud or other improper means" under Article 10 (1) 1 of the General Conditions of the Lease Agreement. The defendant asserts that C was a moving-in report to the defendant's address, not a member of the household of the defendant, but a moving-in report to the defendant's workplace.

arrow