logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.11.30 2017고단1376
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 21, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong District Court’s House on January 21, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s Pyeongtaek District Court’s House on February 25, 2014.

[2] On July 1, 2017, around 05:15, the Defendant driven a DNA low-income vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.056 percent from the 25 kilometer section from the trade influenite to the Gyeonggi-si in the Chungcheongnam-si to the parallel of Gyeonggi-si to the parallel of Samsung apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the circumstances of driving a drinking and notify the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions of the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime are determined by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order and other conditions of the sentencing indicated in the record.

- Despite the history of punishment for driving under drinking twice again, the person has committed another crime of driving under drinking. However, there are some points that may be considered in the circumstances leading to the drinking under this case, and the degree of alcohol concentration in blood does not significantly high. - The defendant is against his mistake.

arrow