logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.16 2018나40010
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the following addition is made under the second part of the judgment of the court of second instance, 16.

On November 23, 2017, the Central Land Tribunal rendered an adjudication to increase compensation for the land and goods owned by the Defendant, etc. on the basis of the above written adjudication on expropriation. On December 18, 2017, the Plaintiff additionally deposited KRW 17,650,000 as Busan District Court Decision 200,000,000, based on the increased compensation prescribed in the above written adjudication on expropriation.

The judgment of the court of first instance at the second instance (based on recognition) No. 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, since the judgment of the court of first instance at the court of first instance at the "Evidence No. 1 through No. 4, 6, and 7 of the part A" is justified, the defendant's appeal is dismissed due to the lack of justifiable grounds.

arrow