logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.09.26 2019나2025637
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Defendant C and D organizations jointly share the Plaintiff Trade Union 3,00.

Reasons

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. On May 1, 2013, the Plaintiffs of the first instance judgment filed the instant lawsuit seeking damages against the Defendants for defamation or infringement of personal rights by specifying the following expressive acts in the first instance court.

The Plaintiffs, submitted to the first instance court on September 4, 2014, specified the cause of the claim, such as the said expressive act, through a preparatory document on September 4, 2014.

On March 19, 2013, which is the cause of the victim's claim, the term "A association" in the demonstration, such as March 19, 2013, which is the object of the judgment of this court, includes the phrase "A association is not a string but a political education worker", and "A association's ideology education Doctrine" 1-2 "B et al.'s heart - the heart of the 180 persons other than B et al., and 1-3 "B defamation 1-3 of the Republic of Korea et al. against students", such as "the crime of giving education to students in the Republic of Korea against the Republic of Korea" is one of the hived educational readings.

A조합에게 피해 입은 학생, 학부모, 교장이 A조합 실상을 알리려 십 수년 노력하지만 A조합를 꺽지 못하고 있습니다.

Even a member of the National Assembly is refluent as a member of the National Assembly, A.I.D. does not have the Madernity.

A. Defamation 2-2

arrow