A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who works as a driving engineer of D, a representative director, at C (hereinafter referred to as “C”) located on the fourth floor of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B building in Manyang-si.

On November 2017, the Defendant, at C office, instructed D to the effect that “any other things, etc., which could be misunderstood in connection with the investigation of the prosecution from among the materials in the office, are moved to an officetel” in relation to the suspected case, such as violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) against D, etc., and transferred the above suspected case documents, etc., which were kept in the custody of the above office, to the office of the Defendant and kept them under the name of the Defendant.

D On December 5, 2017, when it is anticipated that D’s cell phone is seized in the process of the prosecutor’s seizure of C’s office and D’s residence on December 5, 2017, due to the text message that concealed the suspected case documents, etc. stored in the above cell phone in the above officetel, it is anticipated that D’s place of concealment would be discovered. On the same day, contact the Defendant with the o’s cell phone on the same day, “I would immediately be dismissed from the seizure of the cell phone, and I would immediately move the above documents, etc. to another place, and the prosecutor’s office asked the above documents, etc

Around 16:56 of the same day and around 21:10 of the same day, the Defendant moved the foregoing documents, etc. stored in the instant officetel into H building I, which is the Defendant’s residence in the Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

On December 2017, 2017, the Defendant leased the above H building I under the name of the Defendant, and sent the Defendant’s mobile phone text message to the Defendant’s mobile phone to the Defendant’s mobile phone, which led to the seizure of the Defendant’s mobile phone, the H building I would be likely to be known to the prosecution, and the Defendant recommended D to move the above documents, etc. to another place, and D ordered the Defendant to move the above documents, etc. to another place.