logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.12.05 2019누47713
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged in the court of first instance by the Plaintiff for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is re-

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court concerning this case is as follows: "I do not have 9 pages 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance," and "I do not have 9 pages 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance." [Isia, the plaintiff, ① on the instant stairs of the building of this case approved on December 3, 1966, the Rules on Standards for Escape, Fire-Fighting Structure, etc. of the

Article 15(3) of the Act provides that no knobs prescribed under the provision of Article 15(3) are installed, and ② In light of the fact that the knobs of the deceased, even if the knobs were installed on the instant stairs, the knobs of the deceased would have been mitigated even if the knobs were restored or exceeded by the knobs of the deceased, and thus, the instant accident was caused by the defect or the management fault of the facilities, etc.

However, Article 15(3) of the Building Fire Prevention Rules provides that the duty to install knobs, as alleged by the Plaintiff, shall be imposed upon the Plaintiff. The main sentence of Article 2 of the Addenda provides that “When a building permit is applied at the time of enforcement of the Rules and when a building permit is granted or a building report is being constructed, the previous provisions apply to the building of this case which was approved on December 3, 196, and it is difficult to deem that the above Rules apply to the building of this case, which was approved on December 3, 196, as well as the evidence, evidence, evidence, evidence, and evidence, evidence, as alleged by the Plaintiff, are described in the above, and video alone, as alleged by the Plaintiff.

arrow