logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.05.23 2017고단849
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On July 1, 1996, around 21:01, the Defendant’s user, driven B freight and violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management office by operating the said truck with the truck loaded with freight of 11.7 tons out of 3 10 tons in excess of 10 tons out of the restricted axis at the shop of the Korean road construction shop.

2. The Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga decided October 28, 2010 14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Consolidation) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995 and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) stated in Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article.

Article 47(2) proviso of the Constitutional Court Act provides that “The provision applicable to the above facts charged shall retroactively lose its effect in accordance with the decision of unconstitutionality.”

3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in the instant case constitute a crime, and thus, acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow