beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fines 2,500,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 2,800,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 300,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On November 21, 2016, Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year in six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a special injury by the District Court of the Republic of Korea on November 21, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 29, 2016.
[Criminal facts] 2016 Gohap 511
1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and Defendant B
A. Defendant A and Defendant B, who interfered with the business of January 24, 2016, did not appear from the outside of the sales office by installing a steel fence around the sales office of the Victim G Co., Ltd., holding the right of retention on the ground that he completed the construction of the above loan from January 24, 2016 to January 16, 208:30, and from January 24, 2016, Defendant B failed to offer the sale of the said office by restricting his employees’ access.
As a result, Defendant A and Defendant B conspiredd to interfere with the victim's vicarious sale of goods by force.
2) On January 24, 2016, Defendant A and Defendant B meted the victim’s body with a knife’s hand, and Defendant B pushed the victim’s body with a knife with a knife with a knife’s knife’s knife from the auditor C (51) of H Co., Ltd. (51) of H Co., Ltd. (the owner of the above knife).
Accordingly, Defendant A and Defendant B assaulted the victim jointly.
B. Defendant A and Defendant B, who interfered with the business of January 27, 2016, with the foregoing “F” lending between 07:30 on January 27, 2016 and 14:5, 1-2
A. (1) 1) The above sales office is not visible from outside by installing a steel fence in front of the sales office of the victim G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 101 dong 101 dong 101 dong 101) on the grounds that a lien is exercised on the access road to the parking lot due to the reasons as described in the above paragraph, and attaching a paper No. A4 stating “in the event of exercising the right of retention” to the above office glass, and the said employee’s access thereto.