The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is true that the defendant has access to the victim's vehicle, but there is no fact that two persons have been installed with the wheels of the victim's vehicle as stated in the judgment below.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) had been parked on the roadside of the drainage pump place in the circulation of Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeong-si, the Defendant: (c) had 45 degrees in 14:40 on February 10, 2014; (d) had 2 feet (32m in length) above in front and rear the string so as to damage the string of the Dsan PP car (hereinafter “victim”) owned by the victim C; and (e) had 2 feet (32m in length) in front and rear the string so as to damage the string. However, the Defendant discovered and attempted to do so.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in full view of each of the evidence in its judgment.

C. According to the black image that the victim submitted to the investigation agency for the trial, the defendant carried over with F and G at the date and time stated in the facts charged and entered the direction behind the top of the victim's vehicle parked next to India.

In other words, the face from India is recorded.

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor cannot be readily concluded that the defendant installed two wheels in front and rear front of the back wheel of the victim's vehicle beyond the access to the victim's vehicle, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

1) The Defendant asserts that the Defendant had access to the victim’s vehicle from the investigative agency to the court of the trial of the party, or that there is no less than two spons in the wheels of the victim’s vehicle. 2) The victim, based on his own vehicle, is equipped with a spons in the wheels of the vehicle from around 07:40 on February 10, 2014 where he parked his vehicle on the E’s black box that was parked in the second front of the latter.