logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.08.21 2018노717
사기
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

Section A. 4, 7, and 9. Imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of section 3 of the judgment of the court.

Reasons

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of suspended execution, five months of imprisonment, and eight months of imprisonment and eight months of imprisonment for Defendant C) is too unreasonable for the following reasons: (a) the sentence of the lower court (one year of suspended execution, five months of imprisonment, and eight months of imprisonment with labor for the crimes set forth in paragraph (3) of the judgment of the lower court).

2. The crime of insurance fraud is a crime that may harm the purpose of the insurance system and threaten the foundation of the insurance system to a large number of good insurance subscribers. The defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years on October 7, 2015 due to the violation of the Special Act on the Prevention of Telecommunications Financial Fraud and the Refund of Damage, etc., with respect to the crime of Bosing on October 7, 2015, and the judgment was finalized on October 15, 2015, and continued to commit the crime of this case under Articles 7 and 9, despite the suspended sentence of 7 and 9. The defendant C had the record of having already been punished for the crime of the same kind of law, and there is a high possibility of criticism, and there is a need to strictly punish the defendants. The defendant C's assertion that the total amount of damage caused by each crime of the defendant C is about 50,000 won and the total amount of damage caused by the defendant A's respective crimes is considered as 80,000 won and 800 won compensation for the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, as the defendants' appeal is with merit, and the judgment below is ruled again as follows.

arrow