A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor due to habitual larceny, etc. in the support of the Sucheon Prison, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence on May 13, 2017.

On May 30, 2017, the Defendant opened a door that was parked in the CM3 vehicle located in the front of the CM3 vehicle at the Seocheon-si, 11:52 on May 30, 2017, and opened a door that was located in the CM3 vehicle at the end of the CM3 vehicle, and came to have a card tag that is located in the CM3 vehicle at the market price equivalent to 150,000 won, Party A, the market price of which is equivalent to 20,000 won, Party A, Party A, Party B, and Party B, Party B, Party B, and Party B

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Protocols of seizure (voluntary submission) and list of seized articles, and photographs of seized articles;

1. Photographss of damaged vehicles and places where damaged objects are recovered, CCTV images for crime prevention and video records of video records;

1. The CD;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: The application of the defendant's legal statement and inquiry letter, criminal history, and the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentencing conditions under Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes, including the Defendant’s age, sex, home environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered in light of the following circumstances.

3. Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant can have the history of larceny under the same law; the defendant re-offendered the crime of this case during the same repeated crime period; the defendant recognized the crime of this case as well as the victim's favorable circumstances that the victim wants to punish: the defendant recognized the crime of this case; the amount of damage is not relatively large; and the entire amount of damage is returned to the victim.