All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (two years of suspended sentence for each of the Defendants’ imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances based on which the Defendants’ assertion that the sentencing of the lower court was unfair were set out during the oral proceedings of the lower court, and the lower court determined the sentence by taking this into account.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions contained in the records of this case, including the Defendants’ age, sex, family relation, motive, circumstance, means and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime was committed, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance to be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment was rendered.

3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.