A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around 17:30 on March 7, 2018, was arrested as an offender in the act of violence against C and D at around 135, Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu Police Station type, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant stated the Defendant’s assault against C and C. When C stated the Defendant.

“C.” The above police station’s criminal charge and the guard F, who is a police official affiliated with E, expressed the desire to “F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties in the criminal investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C, D, and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on video images inside a mobile phone closure photograph, mobile phone screen image, and CCTV inside a police station;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The defendant's reasons for the imposition of punishment under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act include two times the same criminal records and many criminal records due to violent crimes, the defendant reflects his mistake in depth, and all of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act that are shown in the records shall be determined like the order.