The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) was found in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Hospital (hereinafter “the instant Council member”), demanding the payment of the smuggling rent, and did not smuggling the victim D and did not interfere with the duties of the instant hospital.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the court below: (i) The victim consistently testified from the investigative agency to the court of the court below that he was faced with the chest and the ship in the state of the defendant's hand, and (ii) the physical therapy assistant E, who was a member of the Council, was unable to escape from the disturbance by the defendant from May 12, 201, which was the date of the instant case.

6. On July 1, 200, a physical therapy room stated that the patient being treated in the form of off the clothes was interfered with the work of the above member, such as opening the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening. This fact is confirmed in CCTV images installed in the above member; ③ around April 201, a lessee of the building of this case and the husband of the defendant and the victim, and the head of the building of this case, the contract relationship with G and the owner of the building of this case, who are the lessee of the building of this case, concluded a sub-lease contract on the building of this case on the condition that the defendant is responsible. Since H and I, the owner of the building, were not allowed to enter into the sub-lease contract, they were inevitable to operate the council member of this case, and thus, they did not pay the rent for the sub-lease vehicle to the defendant, as alleged by the defendant, and the victim cannot be deemed to have made a false end at the time of the crime of this case.