A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2013, the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed a loan of KRW 7 million from D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), and thereafter C was unable to repay KRW 7 million, and D lost the Defendant in a lawsuit filed against the Defendant at the Seoul Central District Court on January 15, 2014, and the Defendant deposited the principal amount of KRW 7 million in D around February 7, 2014, and requested D to reduce and exempt interest.

Nevertheless, around April 25, 2014, the Defendant submitted by mail a written complaint to the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office located in 158 according to the distribution of Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, and to the effect that “A request for punishment for E and F in charge of D representative E and person in charge who filed a lawsuit by stealing the name of her joint and several liability even though she did not have any joint and several liability.”

Accordingly, the defendant, the above E and F, had the purpose of having the above E and F receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Written complaint and statement (referred to Nos. 1 and 2 of the evidence list);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the recording book (No. 5);

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommending sentence] 6 months to 2 years (basic area] / The defendant jointly guaranteed the defendant's obligation to D by the request of pro-Japanese C. Since D calls to the defendant to confirm the facts of joint and several liability, it is obvious that the defendant submitted the complaint of this case to the effect that the contract was forged by D's employee, while recognizing that there was a joint and several liability obligation to D, it is obvious that the defendant submitted the complaint of this case to the effect that the contract was forged by D's employee. However, it is unfavorable that the defendant does

However, the defendant has friendship C.