logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2012.07.20 2012고단310
사기
Text

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months.

Defendant

A is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against Defendant A is publicly notified.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B from July 2007 to April 4 credit card companies (new, Samsung, Samsung, and Sck) invested a total of KRW 140 million in shares, including KRW 25 million borrowed from E, KRW 57 million borrowed from E, KRW 62 million borrowed from E, and KRW 62 million borrowed from E, and suffered most loss of principal due to the price fluctuation.

Accordingly, Defendant B, by borrowing money or investing in shares by collecting investors, had her husband receive money from other persons to recover the principal, and had her husband raise money from other persons, and was willing to use it in paying the debt and invest some of the shares.

Defendant

B The first 2010 first 2010 first 200, “A shall make an investment in a certain place of money” to Franman A, and on February 1, 2010, Party B trusted the horses of Defendant B, at the office of F Co., Ltd. in the Dong-gu, Gwangju where he works for the Plaintiff, who was transferred to the university, paid 7.2 million won in advance and returned the principal to the victim G with the monthly profit of KRW 50,000,000,000,000 from the victim’s national bank account in the name of A (Account Number H) under the pretext of investment, and the victim transferred the amount of KRW 50,00,000 to the Defendant B on February 1, 2010.

However, since stock investment is determined profits and losses due to the fluctuation, it was impossible to finally guarantee the payment of principal and profits for the invested funds.

In addition, Defendant B had the idea that part of the funds received from the victim will be used as living expenses or debt repayment, and there was no particular property, while Defendant B had no intention or ability to return the investment funds to the victim and to pay the profits because he had incurred a large amount of debt to credit card companies and other families as above.

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.

arrow