logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.09.08 2016가단12778
원상회복및건물명도등
Text

1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff:

(a) deliver 139.05 square meters on the first floor of a specialized restaurant in Jeju-si. B.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, on February 23, 2014, leased a deposit of KRW 139.05 square meters on the first floor of a specialized restaurant 139.05 square meters on Jeju-si (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendants (the lessee is indicated in the lease contract as Defendant B, but appears as joint lessee) as of February 25, 2016, with the period from February 25, 2014 to February 25, 2016.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). The Defendants occupy and operate the instant real estate.

【No. 1 Evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings】

2. A claim for rent or unjust enrichment;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants were in arrears from February 26, 2016, and sought a return of unjust enrichment equivalent to rent or rent from February 26, 2016.

B. Determination 1) The Defendants are deemed to have paid the Plaintiff the money from February 27, 2016 to 0. 20. 0 . 20 . 0 . 0 . 20 . 0 . 10 . 20 . 0 . 20 . 0 . 20 . 0 . 20 . 0 . 20 . 10 6 . 10 . 16 . 20 . 0 . 10 . 20 . 10 . 16 . 20 . 0 . 20 . 6 0 . 20 . 16 0 . 16 0 . 20 . 7 16 10 . 2016 . 2016 . 16. 25 2016. 20

In full view of Gap evidence 5 and Eul evidence 2-2, the whole purport of the pleadings is examined.

arrow