logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2017.02.15 2015고단260
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2015 order 260】

1. On May 2013, the defrauded Defendant against the Victim C would pay the victim food charges on July 2014, when the third construction of the F Building in the territory of the State F Building is completed on March 2014, at the E cafeteria operated by the Victim C, the victim C around the end of 2013.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the Defendant had not paid income tax in 2003 and had not been bad credit standing. In relation to the second and third completion of the F building, there was a lack of funds due to defective bonds, sewage charges, and payment of expenses for ownership preservation registration, and the sale of F building 2 and third is uncertain, and there was no intention or ability to pay food even if the Defendant was supplied food to the damaged party, because the second and third sale of F building 40 million won due to the unpaid construction cost of the second and third sale of F building 40 million or five hundred million won.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was provided with food equivalent to KRW 14,272,00 from June 2013 to February 2014 by deceiving the victim as above and deceiving the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 14,272,00.

2. On May 17, 2014, the Defendant against the victim G would pay the victim G the price for stone if he/she believed to have the G president and supplied the stone to the victim G in a housing complex for electric source located in the H of Chang-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, to the extent that the amount of stone would be three to four days.

“The purpose of this Act was to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant failed to pay income tax in 2003 and was under bad credit standing. With regard to the second and third completion of the F building, there was a lack of funds due to defective bonds, sewage charges, and payment of expenses for ownership preservation registration. In addition, the sale of F building 2 and third is uncertain and the F building 2 and third is the second and third.

arrow