Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 2018, the Defendant interfering with his duties is punished for city expenses at a restaurant operated by the Victim C in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B market, Dong-gu, Incheon. D, the two children of the victim, “mental tea.”

In addition, the victim and D did not have good appraisal as a ppuri day for the defendant.

At around 10:25 on March 18, 2018, the Defendant found the restaurant at the above restaurant, “I Y, D E. E. B. L. I am b.,” and am bleeped to D, who drinks alcohol at the bed, and am blished D’s face and head head at one time, and walk C’s face and head head head at one time, and am blished the victim’s head and head by hand.

Although Defendant 1 assaulted D and the victim as above, Defendant 1 continued to leave the table table in the above restaurant, and kept the chair outside the restaurant, such as throwing the chair, and raising the chair outside the restaurant, etc., and Defendant 1 removed E, who is the above restaurant customer, and the restaurant customer, and the drinking customer, who was frightened, was frighted in the restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's operation of the restaurant by force.

2. The Defendant interfering with the performance of official duties shall assault the Defendant in front of the restaurant as described in paragraph 1 of around 10:42 around March 18, 2018, and “a male shall assault the Defendant.”

“A police box of the Incheon Central Police Station, which received the 112 report and sent to the scene, refuses to arrest the Defendant as a current offender of assault and interference with his/her duties while refusing to arrest him/her as a criminal of assault and interference with his/her duties, and plicked the victim’s hand and plicked the victim’s right-hand arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C, E, and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV verification and the attachment of photographs and videos);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the choice of each fine for the crime.