1. TC500R in the inside of the factory of Macheon-ro, Macheon-ro, 162, Macheon-ro, Macheon-ro, 162.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 4, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, from June 23, 2014, to June 25, 2018, entered into a comprehensive movable insurance contract (inland, Floter Inc., hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the insured, the Defendant, the lessee’s Intervenor, the Defendant’s Intervenor, and the Defendant, which was manufactured in December 1997 from collateral 197, TR50R term (hereinafter “the instant punch term”) owned by the Defendant, which consists of 148,50,000 won in the purchase amount of insurance.

The terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract include that the Plaintiff compensates the Plaintiff for damages caused by fire, lightning, theft, damage, explosion, explosion/frequency, theft, collision, contact with the vehicle/aircraft, collapse of the building, heavy rain, heavy snow, heavy snow, storm, storm, storm, storm, typhoon, water leakage, and water leakage of the collateral, and that any damages caused by natural wear and tear shall not be compensated.

B. Around June 2014, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant’s Intervenor and the instant punching.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant established and used the instant punching machine in the factory. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s employee (“Defendant”) began to provide all services to operate the instant punching machine, and did not appear and function on the control tower screen of the instant punching machine.

From April 8, 2015 to 10th of the same month, the Defendant’s Intervenor requested repair and inspection from an external company from April 8, 2015 to the 10th of the same month, and was found to have broken down in direct spear Amplifier, which is a component of controlling tensions through punching supply during punching work, and as a result, the instant punching machine was replaced.

C. On April 17, 2015, the circumstances in which the Plaintiff’s request was received, B visited the factory of the Defendant joining the Defendant’s Intervenor to conduct an on-site investigation, and as a result, “the reason for the suspension of the instant punching” is the straight width.