The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as a family principal, did not have any good link with the Victim C (64) with the Victim.

No one shall distribute information with a content that arouses fear or apprehensions through an information and communications network by repeatedly reaching other persons in the form of code, text, sound, image, or picture.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2015. 5. 7. 13:30 경 서울 서대문구 D, 101동 901호 소재 주거지에서 자신의 휴대전화 (E) 을 이용하여 피해자 C의 이동전화 (F )에 “ 이 미친 늙은 년 아 왜 걔한테 전화는 하는데 늙은 년 아 포기해 늙은 년이 잘 보이려 해도 늙은 년이라 걔는 너는 않 먹어 준다, 나한테 엮어 볼래

The phrase “,” sent from May 8, 2015 to May 02:19, 2015, 11 repeatedly sent letters, such as the phrase “crime List,” in the attached Form, that the said victim would have a sense of uneasiness.

The arrival reached.

2. Dismissal of public prosecution;

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (Article 74(1)3 and (2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.);

B. The victim expressed his intention not to punish him after the prosecution of this case

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)