1. The Defendants shall constitute a single and uniform mer new system using the food table, etc. in each building listed in the separate sheet.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be found in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 10, 16, 17 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, and 15, Gap evidence No. 11, the video of the witness F, the witness testimony of the witness G, and some testimony of the witness G.

The Plaintiff: (a) on January 20, 2003, the Plaintiff: (b) sold 116 E (hereinafter “instant building”) located in E (hereinafter “instant building”) out of E (350.41 square meters; (c) the sales price was KRW 1,296,48,000. From March 20, 200, the Plaintiff purchased 116 E (hereinafter “16 store”) from E (hereinafter “HaWD”); and (d) on June 20, 200, the Plaintiff leased 116 stores to Y; (b) the lessee leased 116 stores to Y; and (c) the lessee leased 100 square meters of the instant building to 1,296,48,000; and (d) the Plaintiff’s sales price was KRW 250,000,000; and (d) the lessee leased 1116 stores to Y; and (e) the lessee leased 201,215 B/16 of the instant building.

The type of business of the above contract for sale in lots is public column, and the column of special agreement is stated as "type of business is differentiated from the basic model."

Defendant B, from March 201 to March 201, leased the above store from K, operated the restaurant with the trade name “L” at the above store from March 201, and operated the restaurant in the form of carrying on the business by issuing a food ticket and carrying food in the autonomous food distribution room without a separate food order.

C. Defendant C’s 105 and 106 shop lease and restaurant operation M are the instant case from Habd on December 5, 2002.