logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.18 2014가합57613
청구이의
Text

1. A notary public against the Plaintiff by the Defendants against the Defendants, No. 01385, dated November 22, 2012, 2012.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1 of the parties) The plaintiff is the plaintiff on July 13, 2002, before it was repealed by Law No. 6252 of Jan. 28, 2000, the former Land Readjustment Project Act (amended by Law No. 6252 of Jan. 28,

(2) On October 31, 2012, E was detained on loan fraud charges against E savings banks on June 31, 2012, when E was appointed as the head of the Plaintiff’s association on June 5, 2004.

3) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s director, Defendant C is the Plaintiff’s deceptive act, Defendant C is the F’s wife, and Defendant B is the F. (B) Defendant C agreed to lend KRW 100 million to the Plaintiff on December 3, 2010 by setting the maturity of KRW 5% on December 2, 201, and interest monthly. The Plaintiff remitted KRW 80 million on December 3, 2010, and KRW 100 million on December 6, 2010 to the Plaintiff’s account.

2) On December 15, 2010, Defendant C agreed to lend KRW 200 million to the Plaintiff at the rate of 5% per month interest on December 14, 2011. On December 15, 2010, Defendant C transferred KRW 200 million to the Plaintiff’s account on December 15, 2010. Defendant B agreed to lend KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff on May 11, 201, and KRW 150 million on December 10, 201, and paid KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff’s account to the Plaintiff’s president in cash.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the loans of this case”) by referring to each of the above loans by the Defendants.

On November 22, 2012, F of No. 12, 2012, when the Defendants and the president of the Plaintiff’s association delegated the authority to prepare a notarial deed and the Plaintiff’s association failure to repay each of the loans of this case, to facilitate execution in preparation for the Plaintiff’s failure, the Defendant, on November 20, 2012, lent KRW 650 million to the Plaintiff on December 8, 2012 with the due date set at 24% and with the due date set at 24%, respectively, to the effect that “the Defendant, on December 20, 2012, lent the Plaintiff with the due date set at 650 million won and the due date set at 24% in the event of the Plaintiff’s non-performance of obligation,” notarial deeds of the Monetary Loan Agreement No. 01385,

arrow