The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment, additional collection of 3.7 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime due to economic difficulties, and the period of the instant crime is relatively short, and it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s profit derived from the instant crime is significantly high, and the Defendant’s closure of the instant sexual traffic business place is favorable to the Defendant.

However, even though there are many kinds of records of punishment, such as fines, etc. for the same crime, the Defendant repeatedly operated the instant sexual traffic business, and the Defendant issued a false statement to L, etc. in preparation for the crackdown on the police, and the Defendant issued a false statement to the investigative agency as to the instant sexual traffic business, such as forging a lease contract in the name of L in order to make the instant owner believed L to be L, which is considerably poor in the nature of the crime, such as the Defendant’s filing of a false report with the investigative agency, and it is difficult to see that the Defendant’s mistake is divided or against the Defendant’s true fault, and all other sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, environment, environment, etc., it is difficult to see that the lower

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.