(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2013.12.20 2013고정91

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2013.12.20 2013고정91

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of D-wing and cargo vehicles for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (not taking measures after accidents) against the victim B or C;

At around 23:00 on August 28, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.224% of blood alcohol concentration, and the front road of the Guk Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu was under the influence of alcohol at a eculic speed.

At the time, it was difficult for a driver to see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the defendant's negligence and negligence of driving the vehicle on the right side of the victim B owned by the victim B, which is parked on the right side of the opposite direction to the proceeding, conflict with the left side side of the cargo vehicle of the defendant, and then the victim C's Fump truck driver's left side which is parked after the victim's vehicle was parked after the above victim's vehicle, re-convened into the left side of the cargo vehicle of the defendant

Ultimately, even though the Defendant damaged the property to use dump truck repair cost of KRW 2,439,158, and dump truck repair cost of KRW 392,641 to the victim C due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (fluence) and the Road Traffic Act (fence after an accident) against the victim G while under the influence of alcohol at the time, location, as described in paragraph (1), and as seen above, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle even after the traffic accident and escaped as it is, thereby running the national highway No. 34 located in the So-ri-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu.

At the time, it was difficult to see the electric field at night, and there is a yellow-ray.

참조조문

-도로교통법

유사 판례

-대구지방법원영덕지원 2020.11.04 2020고단228

-대구지방법원 영덕지원 2015.01.21 2014고단164

-대구지방법원 영덕지원 2015.04.29 2015고단19

-대구지방법원 2014.11.13 2014고단4122

-광주지방법원 2012.11.20 2012고정2244