A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 11, 2009, the Defendant, who committed the crime of June 11, 2009, made a telephone call with the victim B in Daegu, “Around June 11, 2009, the Defendant would settle the provisional attachment claim KRW 242 million, which entered the lease deposit of KRW 160,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to appoint a lawyer for the above provisional seizure case as he promised to pay his personal debt with the money received from the victim, even if he received the money from the victim as a lawyer's fee.

After deceiving the victim as such, the Defendant received KRW 15.2 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (E) account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On September 2, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would appoint an attorney-at-law, lose him from the constructive confession due to service by public notice at the first instance court, and without being delivered the judgment, appointed an attorney-at-law to the Defendant for the Defendant’s Civil Litigation (Seoul District Court Decision 2009Da3179 decided July 2, 200, Plaintiff F, and Defendant C) against the Defendant’s wife B, whose date of appeal is over the date of appeal (Seoul District Court Decision 2009Da3179 decided July 2, 200, Plaintiff F, and Defendant C), and will proceed with the appellate trial by filing a subsequent appeal for subsequent completion.”

However, even if the defendant received the money from the victim as the cost of attorney appointment, he did not have the intention or ability to appoint a lawyer for the appellate court of the above civil procedure for the victim.

After deceiving the victim as such, the Defendant received 4.8 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (E) account in the name of the Defendant around September 4, 2009.

This is the defendant.