logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2016.07.05 2015가단8979
공유물분할
Text

1. The remainder of the amount calculated by deducting the auction cost from the proceeds by selling it to an auction with the area of 3860 square meters which is not less than 38,000 square meters prior to

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff and the defendants share the real estate stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article in the same share as that stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article.

B. There was no special agreement prohibiting partition of co-owned property between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, but no agreement was reached.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole argument

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the premise of the claim for partition of co-owned property as to the real estate as stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article is recognized to have been fully satisfied, and it is deemed that it is difficult or inappropriate to divide the real estate in kind in light of the nature, location, area, situation of use, and use value after the division, etc. of the co-owned property.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow