The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the last passenger car in C body.

On June 9, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 23:18, and continued the crosswalk D in front of the Suwon-gu Suwon-si at a speed that would not be known from the former terminal room to the point of the original river basin.

Since there are lots of crosswalks installed, in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to check whether there are pedestrians crossing the crosswalks according to the crosswalks by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got off the part of the victim E (the 42-year-old) crossing the crosswalk from the left side of the Defendant’s course to the right side of the crosswalk, which was the front part of the above vehicle.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant suffered knee salt and tension on the right-hand knee, which requires treatment of the victim by occupational negligence above, he immediately stopped, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as checking damage caused by such negligence.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is difficult to readily conclude that the injured party’s wife suffered from the instant accident constitutes injury to the victim’s completeness or physiological function, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

① On June 12, 2017, 3 days after the date of the instant accident, the victim was admitted to the F Hospital on June 12, 2017, which was 3 days after the date of the instant accident. The victim suffered from the injury of the “F Hospital knee-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe

However, the results of this Court's factual inquiries into the head of the F Hospital.