beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.
, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Defendant A’s criminal records】 On November 19, 2015, at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, sentenced two years of suspension of execution to ten months for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 27, 2015.
Defendant
B On July 30, 2015, in the Western District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, a year of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for six months for embezzlement was sentenced to one year and appealed on August 4, 2015, and the appeal court is still pending.
【Criminal Facts】 2015 Highest 2194】 Defendant A is a person who actually operated K from November 2008.
Around March 5, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim N, stating, “The presses business department of K would have the sales amount to KRW 4 billion and stable. The Defendant will transfer the entire main presses business unit, including the down payment of KRW 100 million, to the victim N.”
However, from January 2014, K had suffered a loss of at least KRW 500 million due to a sudden decrease in the volume of orders issued by K from K, the main trading office, and was in arrears with the burden of leasing equipment equivalent to KRW 70 million per month due to excessive investment in facilities. In addition to the labor cost of KRW 60 million per month and the electricity cost of KRW 50 million equivalent to KRW 200,000,000 for each month, it was a situation in which it has to repay the obligations of bills with maturity continuously due to the fixed cost of KRW 200,000,000, and even if it was an essential business to supply stable electricity, it did not have any intent or ability to transfer the company’s capital for the purpose of living with the victim, even if it received the press proceeds from the victim, the company did not have any intent or ability to transfer the company’s capital.
As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.