1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants are born between the Plaintiff and the networkF.

B. After the death of the deceased F, on June 29, 2010, the Plaintiff resumed with G and resided in the 1,2010 real estate listed in the separate sheet. On March 5, 2015, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the 1,2 real estate listed in the separate sheet, as to the 1,2 real estate listed in the separate sheet, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of donation, but the said donation was rescinded by agreement and revoked the said registration of ownership transfer on July 25

C. Since September 19, 2016, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership, such as the purport of the claim, in the name of Defendant B, South-North Korea on the ground of the donation as of August 18, 2016 on the attached list No. 1, 2, 3, and real estate as of September 19, 2016. Defendant B completed the registration of transfer of ownership, such as the purport of claim, in the name of Defendant C, D, and E, on September 12, 2016.

On September 23, 2016, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer, such as the entries in the purport of the claim, on the ground that the Plaintiff was donated on August 18, 2016 as to the 4 real estate listed in the attached list on September 23, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-2 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) donated real estate indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2 to G; (b) Defendant B sought the Plaintiff around July 2016, and (c) well gather until the Plaintiff’s husband and wife returned to the Plaintiff.

Even after the plaintiff returned to her, the plaintiff requested that G be able to support the real estate listed in the separate sheet as friendly money, and the contract of donation with G was rescinded, and donated the real estate listed in the separate sheet to the defendant B, who is the head of son.

However, after completing the registration of transfer of ownership, Defendant B is unable to proceed with divorce or verbal abuse to the plaintiff couple and has committed anti-humanistic behavior.

In light of the anti-humanistic act after the donation, Defendant B, who did not intend to support the Plaintiff’s husband and wife, deceiving the Plaintiff and let the Plaintiff do so.