Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 16, 2013, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of KRW 4 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) in high-sea support.

[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 2485

1. On June 20, 2017, the Defendant, at around 01:20, driven a Gwork-free car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.235% from the 1km section from the public parking lot adjacent to the D hotel in C to the road adjacent to the F hotel in E, at around 01:20, around June 2017.

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Glessstst Pacific car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, as set forth in paragraph 1, was driving a motor vehicle with the string traffic at the time of the first day of the day set forth in paragraph 1, led to a three-lane of the F hotel in front of the F hotel E at the time of the Jeju to move to movable property due to neglect on the Roter of the New Jeju.

At that time, at night and at that time, there were automobiles waiting for signal signals in the front of the road, and in such a case, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving, had a duty of care to look at the front of the road and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle, to accurately manipulate the steering and the steering system and to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive under normal conditions due to influence of alcohol and continued to drive as it is, due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure to do so, and took the front part of the victim H(63 arch), waiting for a signal at the front direction of the Defendant’s course, and received the front part of the said rocketing taxi operation.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim H to suffer injury to the base and tension in light of the 2 week medical treatment, and the victim J(43 Does) who was the said rocketing taxi dong, thereby requiring approximately 2 weeks medical treatment. In addition, the Defendant suffered injury to the base and tension in light of the following:

"The defendant of "2018 Highest 306".