logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.04.25 2018나212406
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 21, 2017, the Plaintiff was faced with head in the Skin Skin display stand, which was illegally protruding towards India, from the 1st floor of the Dong-si, the Government of the Republic of Korea, the Defendant was running.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

In the instant accident, the Plaintiff received treatment, such as 5th century, due to injury to the two parts of the body, etc.

C. On December 21, 2017, the Defendant paid KRW 100,000 to the Plaintiff for medical expenses, etc. in relation to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, and 5, Gap evidence 6 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

2. The accident at issue occurred due to the negligence that the Defendant illegally protruding the display stand towards India.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the above accident.

3. Scope of liability for damages

A. According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 7 and the oral argument, it is recognized that the following losses were incurred to the Plaintiff due to the instant accident. ① From December 21, 2017 to March 26, 2018, KRW 73,300 medical expenses for Eunception surgery; ② KRW 1,200 medical expenses for the F pharmacy on December 21, 2017; ③ KRW 4,200 won in total on December 22, 2017; ④ KRW 3,300 in the G pharmacy medicine expenses on December 23, 2017; ⑤ KRW 3,000 in the F pharmacy expenses on May 27, 2017; ② the Plaintiff’s reimbursement of consolation money for the treatment expenses to the extent that it is not clear whether the expenses for Eunception surgery expenses were to be reimbursed or not, and thus, the Plaintiff’s reimbursement of consolation money for the treatment expenses to the extent that it is not possible to acknowledge the above expenses.

The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone proves that such expenses have been incurred due to the foregoing accident.

arrow