1. The Defendant’s ship on January 29, 2019, in light of the description of A evidence No. 2.

On March 4, 2019, each two years against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Co., Ltd.”) (hereinafter “Plaintiff Co., Ltd.”) and C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, K, L, M, N, andO are business operators prescribed in subparagraph 1 of Article 2 of the former Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (amended by Act No. 14813, Apr. 18, 2017; hereinafter “former Fair Trade Act”) and are corporations that engage in spatial data business, such as aerial photography business (hereinafter “instant business operators”), and the Plaintiff Co., Ltd is the representative director of the Plaintiff Co., Ltd.

B. The aerial photography business is a type of business that bears the burden of purchasing aircraft, operating aircraft, employing maintenance personnel, etc. Accordingly, the number of companies registered with the license is very small compared to other spatial data industries, such as spatial image painting and numerical map production.

Since 209, in order to eliminate the risk of decline in the bidding and order the business in a stable manner, the instant business operators agreed to jointly carry out the business and divide the profits according to their shares by making the pre-determined company receive the successful bid through the qualification examination ordered by P (hereinafter “instant service”).

C. The qualification examination system applied to the instant service tender is a method of determining successful bidders after performing the qualification examination in the order of persons who participated in the tender at the lowest price, which is below the estimated price among participants who passed the project performance capability evaluation in advance.

The assessment items of the qualification examination shall be made by allocating 50 points to the service performance ability and bid price when the amount of the service is less than one billion won, and 50 points to the service performance ability and 50 points to the tender price, and if the service performance ability and tender price are not less than one billion won, 70 points to the service performance ability and 30 points to

two categories are classified into the two categories.

When the results of the examination are below the estimated price, and the comprehensive score of senior bidders is at least 90 points after giving priority in the order of bidders.