1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

(a) At present, the Plaintiff is currently running the Olympic Winter (Seoul Terminal; hereinafter referred to as the “Dongmgu”): the Olympic Winter (Seoul Terminal; hereinafter referred to as the “Dongmmgu”): the JCT Central Expressway, the East Hongcheon IC, Yangyang-si, and the Yangyang-si: the starting point in Seoul (Seoul): the Olympic Twit, the selling party intersection, the plenary, the pyeong, the red, the human agents, the freeboard, the open entrance of the west, the west-do, the free-to-door entrance, the free-to-door entrance, the free-to-door entrance and exit, the free-to-door entrance, the free-to-door entrance, the free-end area: the free-to-door bus transport business operator who operates the route, such as the free-to-door (hereinafter referred to as the “total route”).

B. On March 31, 2014, the Intervenor filed an application with the Defendant for authorization on the modification of the business plan (hereinafter “instant existing routes”) of the same content as indicated in the following table (hereinafter “instant existing routes”) with respect to the system numbers 3-2-35 routes (hereinafter “instant routes”) (hereinafter “instant modification of business plan”).

Seoul (Seoul) the 5th day after the 332.1 day in Seoul (Seoul), the Gangnam-gu Highway, the Young-dong Highway, the East-gu Highway, the East-dong Highway, the East-gu ICT, the Yangyang-do, the Haak Jin High-si, and the 332.1 day in Seoul (Seoul), the 5th day in May 275, 275.

C. Accordingly, on April 3, 2014, pursuant to the main sentence of Article 78(1) of the Passenger Transport Service Act (hereinafter “the Act”), the Defendant requested the Gyeonggi-do Si to consult on the amendment of the instant project plan (hereinafter “instant request for consultation”). However, on April 16, 2014, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do, issued a request to the Defendant for consultation on the amendment of the instant project plan. On April 16, 2014, the amendment of the instant project plan, to the Defendant, caused excessive competition between the Plaintiff’s route and the non-party company East-2-188 routes of the East-BS system (hereinafter “Dong East-SSS system”), and it violates Article 32(2)3 of the Enforcement Rule of the Act.

Accordingly, the defendant on 2014.