logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.10.28 2016고정513
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 1, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment with prison labor due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving Driving) at the Seogu District Court Branch Branch on July 1, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 9, 2016.

The Defendant is a driver of a passenger car in e-cub.

On July 28, 2015, at around 14:00, the Defendant driven the said car at approximately 1 kilometer while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.282%, even before the bus stops of the Hyundai Trac apartment apartment located in the same Gu and located in the same Gu, on the roads near the dead Bana-dong of Daegu, Seogu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on actions taken against an employer, and report on the status of an employer-employed driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, references to the summary of case agreements, and copies of judgment of the court of first instance;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for the crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant has committed the instant crime again under several names, and the blood alcohol concentration is very high and thus the nature of the relevant crime is not good: Provided, That the fine amount of the summary order shall be reduced in part by taking into account the equity in the case where the judgment

arrow