1. The Plaintiff’s lawsuits against Defendant A, Defendant A, Defendant A, and Defendant Marenk Co., Ltd. are all filed.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company running a non-life insurance business, etc., and the Defendant Dong Seo-gu Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant company”) is a company running the automobile maintenance business, etc.

The owner of each repair vehicle listed in the attached Table 1 is the defendant A, the defendant A, the defendant Amala Co., Ltd., and the defendant Marena Co., Ltd.

B. The Plaintiff entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with Defendant A, with respect to the vehicles Bi30 (hereinafter “instant i30 vehicles”), and entered into each insurance contract with Defendant Mamrenk Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) with respect to the instant vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

C. (1) On June 12, 2014, Defendant A driving the instant i30 vehicle on or around 15:56 on June 12, 2014, and attached Table 1 A.

The accident described in the subsection has occurred.

Upon the occurrence of the above accident, Defendant A requested the Defendant Company to repair the above vehicle destroyed by the above accident, and the Defendant Company completed the repair of the above vehicle on July 4, 2014.

(2) On June 26, 2014, Defendant Mamack Co., Ltd. operated the instant low-priced vehicle on June 26, 2014, and attached Table 1 B.

The accident described in the subsection has occurred.

After the occurrence of the above accident, Amaman Co., Ltd. requested the defendant company to repair the above vehicle damaged by the above accident, and the defendant company completed the repair of the above vehicle on July 18, 2014.

(3) around 16:00 on July 12, 2014, Defendant Marenk Co., Ltd. operated the instant franchise and its vehicle, and attached Table 1 C.

The accident described in the subsection has occurred.

After the occurrence of the above accident, Marenk Co., Ltd. requested the defendant company to repair the above vehicle damaged by the above accident, and the defendant company completed the repair of the above vehicle on July 19, 2014.

In the event of a dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant company, the defendant company remains.