Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 09:30 on December 23, 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in high speed buses, where the victim C (the 21-year-old 21-old 21-year-old 21-old 20) was seated by the next seat in the B, Many-high speed bus where the Defendant was traveling on the Docheon-si Highway.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles on criminal facts and Article 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes elective Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Where the conviction of a defendant against a sexual crime subject to registration of personal information under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order is finalized, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and is obligated to submit personal information to a related agency pursuant

In light of the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of repeating a crime, type, motive, process, consequence and seriousness of the crime in this case, disclosure order or notification order, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s entrance due to such order, the preventive effect of the sexual crime subject to registration that may be achieved therefrom, and the effect of protecting the victims, etc., the disclosure order or notification order shall not be issued to the Defendant, on the grounds that there are special circumstances under which the disclosure of personal information may not be disclosed or notified pursuant to the proviso of Articles 49(1) and 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.

In the early stage of the investigation, the defendant denied the crime of this case, but this court shows the appearance of confession and reflect, and is a quasi-indecent act.