logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.12.24 2015고단1818
재물손괴
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2015, around 19:49, the Defendant destroyed the front glass of KRW 521,600 at the market price of the D Sona vehicle, which was parked at the same place, on the ground that the Defendant reported himself as assault, etc. before the victim C, at the parking lot of Doo-gun, Doo-gun, Doo-gun, and Doo-gun, Doo-gun, Doo-gun, Doo-gun, Doo-gun, Doo-gun, and Doo-si

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the occurrence of an accident, each report on internal investigation, and each investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the sentencing guidelines are not applicable as the punishment was selected) of the provisional payment order (the sentencing guidelines are not good, and there is no agreement with the victim, and the defendant has been punished several times. In particular, on June 5, 2015, the Jeonju District Court sentenced one year to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for four months and one day after the judgment became final and conclusive on June 13, 2015, and committed the instant crime only 17 days after the date on which the judgment became final and conclusive.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided, the defendant deposited 300,000 won for the victim on December 23, 2015, the victim's automobile insurance, which the victim subscribed, seems to have recovered from damage. The crime of this case is not the crime of the same kind as the crime of the judgment of suspension of execution, and the crime of this case is not the crime of the same kind as the crime of the crime of the above crime of this case, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case and the circumstances after the crime of this case

arrow