1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the case where the court of first instance cites the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is by the main sentence

According to the fact-finding inquiry report to the head of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seocho-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, the name of the child-care center of this case is recognized as changed on May 3, 2016, and such name was changed on May 17, 2016, and the defendant later changed the name to "D child-care center" or the situation of operation of the child-care center of this case after the fact-finding on April 30, 2016, it cannot be deemed that the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to terminate the lease contract of this case on April 30, 2016 only with the change of the name or the sending of proof of the contents of this case, considering the circumstance that the name of the child-care center of this case was changed to "D child-care center" and the name of the child-care center of this case was changed to "E" on May 3, 2016.

(i) "";

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.