logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.10 2015가합543172
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s annual interest in KRW 160,020,000 to Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. as well as in relation thereto from October 30, 2014 to April 26, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Plaintiff Co., Ltd.") are companies that manufacture, process and sell agricultural products, such as molds powder, and the plaintiff B is the representative director of the plaintiff company.

B. The Plaintiffs’ investigation and trial 1) The Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products (hereinafter “Korea Origin Labeling Act”) that falsely displayed and sold the country of origin of the red powder manufactured by mixing the red powder powder with the red powder powder in Korea with the red powder in Korea.

(ii)The National Agricultural Product Quality Management Service (hereinafter referred to as the “Quality Management Service”) from August 201, 201 due to suspicion of violation, etc.

) The investigation of the prosecution and the prosecution (hereinafter referred to as “instant investigation”);

was received.

Plaintiff

On January 25, 2012, the company was not detained due to the violation of the Act on Origin Labeling at the Gwangju District Court, and the plaintiff B was detained due to the violation of the Act on Origin Labeling at the above court on the same day.

2. The release was made on bail around 16.

2) On March 7, 2013, the Gwangju District Court rendered a judgment of conviction (2012 high group 224, 1440 (combined)) against the Plaintiff Company in the amount of ten months and ten million won, and the Gwangju District Court dismissed all appeals filed by the Plaintiffs on July 17, 2013 (2013No605), but the Supreme Court accepted the appeal filed by the Plaintiffs on February 13, 2014, and sentenced the reversed and remanded judgment (2013Do9605, hereinafter “instant judgment”), and the Gwangju District Court acquitted the Plaintiffs on July 17, 2014 (2014No3914, 2014). The Prosecutor’s final judgment of innocence became final and conclusive (2014No3904, 2014, 2014).

C. 1) The quality control officer: (a) the head of the red paper powder seizure and disposal 1) the red paper powder powder powder, supplied by the Plaintiff Company to its customers, approximately 12,00 kg of the red paper powder ( approximately 11,100 kg of the red paper powder processing plant, and approximately 11,100 kg of the red paper powder powder, supplied to the Plaintiff Company’s customers.

arrow