1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant):

A. All the first floor above the real estate listed in the separate sheet 78.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the real estate indicated in the attached list. The Defendants are married couple and run a restaurant with the name of Defendant C’s business operator on the first floor of the above real estate.

B. On August 14, 2007, E entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B on the whole of the first floor and the first floor (hereinafter “the leased object in this case”) of the real estate listed in the separate sheet with Defendant B by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 70 million, KRW 50 million per month, KRW 500,000 per month, and the lease period of KRW 24 months. The above lease agreement was explicitly renewed on August 14, 2009 and August 14, 201, respectively, and the Defendants occupied and used the leased object in this case until now.

(The above lease contract is stipulated as a lessor, and the above lease contract is also stipulated as a lessor (hereinafter referred to as the "instant lease contract").

According to the instant lease agreement, the lessee did not change the use, structure, etc. of the leased object without the lessor’s consent (the first part of Article 3), and the lease agreement may be terminated if the lessee did not pay the leased object to the second period (Article 4), and the necessary expenses, such as premium and beneficial expenses, were not recognized as a special agreement.

[(i)(former part)]

Upon the death of E, the Plaintiff, who shared the attached list real estate as E, acquired ownership by transfer of E’s shares in the said real estate according to testamentary gift. On March 12, 2013, the Plaintiff notified the Defendants by document proving the content of the instant lease that he/she had no intent to renew the instant lease, and the said notification reached the Defendants.

(A) On May 12, 201, the Plaintiff notified Defendant B of the fact that the instant lease agreement was terminated as of August 14, 2011, but thereafter, the said lease agreement continued to be maintained. Therefore, it is reasonable to deem that the said termination agreement was revoked).

On the other hand, the Defendants on May 2009.