logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2019.06.12 2018가단207426
기타(금전)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 10 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from January 30, 2018 to June 12, 2019, and the following.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In order to promote a housing redevelopment project in a zone B (hereinafter “instant project”) on November 19, 2007, the Defendant is a corporation authorized and permitted under the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017; hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), and the instant project is promoted by the redevelopment partnership method under the Urban Improvement Act.

On July 30, 2016, at the open meeting on July 30, 2016, the decision was made by changing the business method and implementing the regional housing association under the Housing Act.

B. On August 10, 2016, the Defendant entered into a business agreement with C (hereinafter “C”) to act as an agent for the recruitment of union members, establishment and implementation of detailed plans for the project of the said regional housing association, establishment and publicity of the public relations center for housing exhibition, payment management of contributions, and occupancy management, etc. After establishing the regional housing association promotion committee, the said promotion committee was added as a party to the said committee on September 22, 2016, and the promotion committee again entered into a business agreement with C with the content that actually performs the Defendant’s duties.

(2) At the time of the instant work agreement, C concluded a contract and documentary evidence between the Defendant and the trust company with the cooperative company as a contribution of the local housing association members, and concluded a contract and documentary evidence of expenditure between C and the cooperative company with the cooperative company as a contribution of the local housing association members, and the tax issue data. In addition to the agreement on the instant work agreement, C and the project cost (such as campaign official design and construction cost, promotion advertising cost, solicitation agency fee, trust fee, trust fee, etc.) to perform the duties performed by C at the time of the instant work agreement.

C. Around March 30, 2016, C entered into a service contract with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), which entrusts C with the recruitment and sale of union members among the instant business affairs. D.

The defendant, on or around December 20, 2016, is a cooperative law, not a method of the regional housing association.

arrow