beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B and C jointly share KRW 28,937,05 and the same from August 17, 2012 to February 2, 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 17, 2012, Defendant C driven a D Aban vehicle owned by Defendant B (hereinafter “Aban vehicle”) and proceeded with the road front of the warehouse for the storage of re-facilities located in the Geumcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, which is located in Geumcheon-si.
At the time, it was a road where the center line was installed at night and yellow-line, so the defendant C neglected his duty of care to avoid breaking the center line, and instead neglected this, the defendant C received the front part of the E-Track's vehicle quantity (hereinafter referred to as the "victim's vehicle") operated by the plaintiff, which he gets the front part of the E-Track's vehicle size (hereinafter referred to as the "victim") operated by the plaintiff, and caused the plaintiff to suffer the injury, such as the left part 7, 8 lever catus.
B. Defendant Samsung Fire Co., Ltd.: (a) concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with Defendant B as the insured with respect to a sea-going vehicle; (b) the said automobile insurance contract was concluded with a special agreement for limited operation of the married couple; and (c) at the same time, Defendant Samsung Fire concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to an accident occurred while a person other than the Defendant B was driving. (b) At the same time, Defendant Samsung Fire concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “instant non-life insurance contract”) including a special security for a self-physical accident of KRW 30,000,000 with respect to the damaged vehicle (hereinafter “self-physical accident”) and a maximum amount of KRW 20,000,000,000 for a non-insurance vehicle.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 13 evidence and Eul 1, 6, 7 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination as to claims against Defendant B and C
A. According to the fact of recognition of liability, Defendant C is a driver of a sea-going vehicle, and Defendant B is an owner of a sea-going vehicle and is an operator under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.