A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 15, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court.

[2] On September 28, 2020, the Defendant: (a) driven an epoter flobbbbing flobing flobing flobing flobing flobing flobing flobing flobing flobsing flobsing flobsing flobsing flobsing flobsing flobsing flobsing flods

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report on the circumstances of the driver who is placed in driving, investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver who is placed in driving in driving in driving), notification of the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking, inquiry into the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking ( September 28, 202) and internal investigation report (on-site

1. Previous convictions in judgment: (A) a written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, a report on investigation (verification of the same criminal suspect's records), and application of a summary order of approximately 2718 high-aid 2009 high-ranking statutes;

1. Considering the fact that the relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1), 44 (1) (the point of drinking and the selection of imprisonment), and the high level of alcohol concentration in blood, etc. concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to reduce the amount of loss (including the fact that there is a misunderstanding of any error, and the fact that the driving of the drinking of this case does not cause any traffic accident due to the driving of the drinking of this case);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (in addition to the grounds for reduction of the amount of punishment above, considering that the Defendant has been punished three times by a fine not later than 200 years as a result of the judgment, except for the cases where the Defendant was punished with the records of the judgment);

1. It is decided as per the Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;