The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On March 16, 2016, at around 18:30, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim to move the said vehicle to the victim on the ground that the Frento vehicle of the victim E (n, 53 years old) illegally parked and obstructed the Defendant’s vehicle operation; (b) followed the victim entering the said real estate, followed the victim into the said real estate, and followed the victim, and took a dispute with the victim, and assaulted the victim by taking the part of the victim’s clothes on his/her hand by taking off the part of the victim’s clothes, and making the victim use the part of the victim’s clothes in the clothes.

2. The facts charged in the judgment can not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act as a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

In doing so, according to the written agreement bound in the trial records, it can be acknowledged that the victim E expressed his/her intention not to be punished on August 23, 2017, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.