logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.01.18 2016나55732
소유권말소등기등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as follows, except for the modification of two or less parts below the three pages of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the court of first instance cites it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the revised part, the evidence No. 2, No. 2, No. 1, 2, 3, and No. 6 (the purport of the real estate sales contract, the testimony and the whole pleadings by the witness of the first instance trial, is recognized according to the real estate sales contract, and the evidence No. 8 of the first instance trial is insufficient to reverse the evidence, and it seems that the land in the dispute of this case is included in “No. 3 and M at 2 lots, which are located at the bottom of the real estate sales contract.”

(1) According to the purport of the testimony and arguments of the witness E and K in the first instance trial, as of June 17, 198, K purchased at KRW 168,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00.

2. Conclusion.

arrow