logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.13 2017고정808
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

After the Defendants became aware of each other through the “C” of the Internet hosting site 3 months prior to the 3-month period, the Defendants were dissatisfied with the issue of slandering in writing.

1. On December 3, 2016, Defendant A: (a) on the street in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on the ground as seen above, the victim B (E) and the victim during the dispute at the time of vision for the said reason, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the victim’s her neck, she was about to live in the place where the Defendant was bread; (b) he was pushed the victim’s chest with the shoulder; and (c) the victim’s chest was pushed the victim’s chest, she was flad with the victim’s knife in order to cause the Defendant; and (d) the victim’s face was 3 to 4 times; and (d) the victim was flad with the victim’s 10th 5th vert, flad with the 10th troke, flad with the bed, and tension.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and place specified in paragraph (1), and at the same time and place, the victim A (53 tax) and the victim did assaulted the victim by towing the victim’s breath to the seat of the vehicle by using the breath’s breath, while disputing the victim’s breath for the foregoing reasons.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. A medical certificate of injury, certificate of diagnosis, and certificate of medical treatment;

1. A detailed statement of the processing of reported cases, each photograph, and a report on dispatch to the scene;

1. Answers to submit documents to the Daegu Regional Headquarters of the National Health Insurance Corporation;

1. A criminal investigation report (Evidence No. 3, 14, and 16) (Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that a victim’s act was not injured by the Defendant’s act, i.e., the five main directions of the 10th diagnosis.

① On December 3, 2016, on the date of the occurrence of the instant case, the victim filed an appeal for Israri, and sent it to the 119 first-class F Hospital. ② On December 3, 2016, the victim was diagnosed by the F Hospital as “X-ray’s salt and tension” after the X-ray inspection, and on February 6, 2017, the victim was diagnosed by the F Hospital, and was diagnosed by the CT photographing at the said hospital.

arrow