The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is that the Defendant agreed on March 31, 2015 to prepare and submit a report on a real estate transaction agreement with G, buyer and seller D, as the wife of G, buyer and seller D, and the agent of J, the document of this case does not fall under the foregoing Article.

2. Determination

A. In light of the difference between the first instance court and the appellate court’s method of evaluating the credibility of the statement of a witness in the first instance, the first instance court shall not reverse the first instance court’s decision without permission, on the grounds that the first instance court’s decision on the credibility of the statement made by a witness in the first instance is different from the appellate court’s decision, in light of the contents of the first instance judgment and the evidence duly examined by the first instance court, or that the first instance court’s decision on the credibility of the statement made by a witness in the first instance is clearly erroneous in light of the evidence duly examined by the first instance court, or that the first instance court’s decision on the credibility of the statement made by a witness in the first instance is clearly unreasonable in full view of the results of the first instance court’s examination and the results of additional evidence examination conducted by the time of closing argument in the appellate court

B. The Defendant asserted to the effect that this part of the grounds for appeal are alleged, but the lower court rejected the above assertion on the grounds of detailed reasons in the judgment.

In light of the record, the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below was clearly erroneous in the judgment of the court below.

There is no reasonable circumstance to see that the argument leading to the fact-finding is remarkably unfair because it is against logical and empirical rules.

Defendant.