1. As to the judgment of the defendant's failure to return the deposit for the lease on the deposit before the Changwon District Court 8698.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 14, 2014, Nonparty E died after having left the Plaintiffs, who are Nonparty D and children, who are the wife as bereaved family members.

B. On November 25, 2014, the Plaintiffs reported the waiver of inheritance as the heir to the Changwon District Court Masan Branch E, and the said court rendered a ruling accepting the said declaration of renunciation of inheritance on November 26, 2014 as the case where the said declaration was accepted on November 26, 2014.

C. On December 16, 2014, D reported the qualified acceptance as the heir of the Changwon District Court Branch E, Msan Branch E, and the said court rendered a judgment accepting the said qualified acceptance report as of December 17, 2014.

In the case of the refund of deposit for the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the

E. On December 7, 2016, D died after having left for their children as bereaved family members.

F. On March 6, 2017, the Plaintiffs reported a qualified acceptance as the deceased’s heir to the Daejeon Family Court. On March 17, 2017, the said court rendered a judgment accepting the said qualified acceptance as the deceased’s heir.

G. According to the instant judgment, the Defendant filed an application for the grant of the succeeding execution clause with the Plaintiffs as the successors to the network D. On May 23, 2017, the Changwon District Court Masan Branch Branch Court issued the succeeding execution clause with the Plaintiffs as the successors to the network D’s successors in accordance with the order of the judicial assistant officers.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, and purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of recognition as to the plaintiffs' claims, the network D bears the obligation to pay KRW 120,000,000 to the defendant within the scope of the property inherited from the network E in accordance with the judgment of this case.