beta
Text
1. Of each real estate listed in the separate sheet, the shares of the Plaintiff A 56/315, the shares of the Plaintiff B 11/315, the Plaintiff C, J, E, G, H, and I.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) is indicated to have acquired ownership in the previous land cadastre column for the owner’s land cadastre of the unregistered land. The current landowner’s column for land cadastre is indicated as having obtained ownership on March 31, 1914 by “K LA’s situation”. The current landowner’s column for land cadastre is indicated as having obtained ownership on March 31, 1914.
B. The transcript of the network M puts by the plaintiffs is indicated as "N", the place of birth is "O in Chungcheongnam-si," and M was deceased on August 23, 1935 and its heir died on November 30, 197, and there is the plaintiffs who are the spouse, P, and their children (However, the plaintiff A is the family heir, the plaintiff Eul is the father who is not within the same family register, and the plaintiff F is the father in the same family register) after P died on March 31, 2014, and then P is its heir.
C. From around 1997, the property tax on each of the instant real estate has been imposed on Qua who occupied each of the instant real estate.
In accordance with the consolidation of administrative districts on April 1, 1914, the Sinju-si, where each real estate of this case is located, the Sinju-si, by combining part of the Sinju-gun, Cheongri-ri, and U.S. at the time, was incorporated into the Sinju-Gun, and the name was changed to the Sinju-si, Cheongju-si, around July 8, 1956.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 13, 16, 19, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Defendant asserts that, although each of the instant real estate in question is unregistered land and its owner is clearly confirmed on its land cadastre, the Defendant’s Republic of Korea does not deny the ownership of L as its owner. Thus, the instant lawsuit has no benefit of confirmation.
In this case, each real estate of this case.